Tldrlegal software licenses explained in plain english. How can gpl terms apply to distribution of a proprietary. Effortlessly track and comply with your open source licenses. Licence zabbix the enterpriseclass open source network. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a programto make sure it remains free software for all its users. Explaining and understanding the gnu general public license. Gnu gpl general public license is the most known among open source. In the osis own words, these licenses allow software. Use the license preferred by the community youre contributing to or depending on. The gnu affero general public license is designed specifically to ensure that, in such cases, the modified source code becomes available to the community. The android open source project aosp uses a few open source initiative approved open source licenses for our software. Below are answers to common questions, based on public information related to his activities, and some of the legal principles that underlie open source compliance enforcement. Once the tlo has approved release of the software via an open source license, you may then post or distribute your software under such open source license.
If you have licensed software youve written under gpl version 2, and you are the original licensor of that software, you may wish to relicense your software. Sep, 2016 well, it depends on what you call permissive. Jul 24, 2018 in the absence of distribution, a user is merely using the software, and since the act of running the gpl code is not subject to the license, one does not have to share their modifications to the code. The original affero gpl was designed to ensure that all users of a web application would be able to receive its source. Gnu general public license gpl the gnus general public license is the most popular open source license around.
Gnu general public license version 2 open source initiative. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the. When a person or company wants to use a project licensed underfor examplegpl v3, apache 2. Ive done a lot of research on this, but im still quite confused. The gnu general public license permits making a modified version and letting the public access it on a server without ever releasing its source code to the public. We provide the source code of the gpl programs until five 5 years after the discontinuation of same model of this projector product. As a free software license, much of the stewardship and support for the gpl has been driven by the free software foundation.
By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free softwareto make sure the software is free for all its users. Gplv2v3 for open source projects users must release their code if using the given library publicly distributing the software using it. The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. Copyleft licenses include several common opensource and free content licenses, such as the gnu general public license gpl and the creative commons attributionsharealike license ccbysa.
You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. This post takes a look at the legal issues raised by both cases and what they mean for foss producers and users. If you should know, there are several other open source licenses too, some of which claim to offer even more freedom than the gpl such as mozilla public license, bsd licence, apache 2. Frequently asked questions regarding open source software oss and the department of defense dod this page is an educational resource for government employees and government contractors to understand the policies and legal issues relating to the use of open source software oss in the department of defense dod. Lawsuit threatens to break new ground on the gpl and. A quick guide to gplv3 gnu project free software foundation. While the project strives to adhere to the preferred license, there. We will make several changes to gp, software to make it work with our device and are ok to make derived source code open source. Lgpl allows you to use and distribute the open source software with your application without releasing the source code for your application. Would there be any gpl related problem with publishing an open source plugin interface which would serve as a bridge between a gpl program and any plugins, be they open or closed source, which use a particular documented api that is in no way, shape, or form, derived from that of any gpl ed program, and then designing a plugin which exposes. Can i release my software under gpl and later after rewriting the gpl library change license to bsd. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project. The gpl is a copyleft license, which means that derivative work must be opensource and distributed under the same license terms.
When versata software sued ameriprise financial services for breaching its software license, it unwittingly unearthed a gpl violation of its own and touched off another lawsuit that could prove to be a leading case on free and open source software licensing. The project is open source, so i want others to make use of it as well, but i dont want them to create derivative works with closed source licenses. Gnu general public license this license, commonly known as the gpl, has two versions that are actively and widely used in many open source communities. Use of the manual is a subject to the following terms. Open source licenses like gpl in multiple licenses models.
Gplv3 improved compatibility with several open source software licenses such as apache license, version 2. Open source licenses are licenses that comply with the open source definition in brief, they allow software to be freely used, modified, and shared. Gnu general public license and commentaries edited by robert chassell. This is in distinction to permissive free software licenses, of which the bsd licenses and the mit license are widelyused lessrestrictive examples. Unfortunately, i am linking to a library which is based on gpl.
Right now i do not have time to rewrite that library. The gnu general public license is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works. I wrote software which i would like to release under the bsd license. In the osis own words, these licenses allow software to be. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses wikipedia. This general public license applies to most of the free software foundations software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. Opensource software is licensed so that anyone can use, alter, and share it. Gpl was the first copyleft license for general use. The gnu affero gpl version 3 has also been brought into the fold. Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files the software, to deal in the software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, andor sell copies of the software, and to permit persons to whom the software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions. The gnu general public license is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds. Zabbix is free and open source software, however, if you use zabbix in a commercial context we kindly ask you to support development of zabbix by purchasing some level of commercial support. This is a comparison of free and open source software licenses.
Recent versions of the open software license have a term which requires distributors to try to obtain explicit assent to the license. To make it free software, you need to release it under a free software license. Understanding opensource and free software licensing medium. The free software foundation maintains a list of gpl compatible licenses at 9 and of gpl incompatible licenses at 10. Which of the following best describes your situation. Top 10 gnu gpl license questions answered whitesource. The gnu gpl requires that when you use gpllicensed software to make other software and release it to the public, the resulting software must be open sourced with the same license. Richard stallman created the gpl to protect the gnu software from becoming proprietary, and it is a specific implementation of his copyleft concept. The gpl is considered the standard open source software licence, and many non software works are published under the gpl as well. While the gpl is an open source license, it is fundamentally a free software license. Gpl and lgpl open source licensing restrictions stack. Today, the gpl license that stallman pioneered is in its third version gnu gplv3 and is only one of several dozen types of open source licenses.
Difference between different types of open sources licenses. We are planning to use an open source gnu gpl license software for distribution also with the hardware we sell. What is the difference between gpl, agpl and lgpl licenses. If a user of gpl code decides to distribute or publish a work that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the open source or any part thereof, it must make the source code available and license the work as a whole at no charge to third parties under the terms of the gpl thereby allowing further modification and redistribution. The first version of the affero general public license agplv1, was published by affero, inc. Gpl, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the gpl too. There are licenses accepted by the osi which are not free as per the free software definition.
I have licensed every piece of software i have ever written under the. Information site tracking rate of gpl v3 license adoption. List of presentation transcripts about the gpl and free software licenses. The open source initiative, an organization founded in 1998 to promote open source software and normalize the use of the term, has approved more than 80 open source licenses. The most widely used open source license is the gpl. The gpl guarantees everyone with the software identical permissions.
If you have some code you are thinking of releasing under an open source license, and you want a quick overview of the broadstrokes differences between these licenses, you have come to the right place. Fsfs free software and osis opensource licenses together are called foss licenses. Im currently working on an arduinocompatible software project. For questions about the public domain, please see this. Difference between freeware and open source software different types of open source licenses. Jun 21, 2016 most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. Nov 02, 2016 the gnu general public license exists to protect the liberties of software creators and users alike. The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to none unlicense. Yes, notification is the essence of most open source licenses including the gpl. However below situation do exist for us in order to complete the whole package. Notice that the popular licenses featured on the home page gnu gplv3 and mit fall.
Many in the open source community have expressed concern about the activities of patrick mchardy in enforcing the gnu general public license gpl against linux distributors. Software and open source licensing mit technology licensing. The tlo will discuss open source licensing strategies with the authors. Gpl and lgpl open source licensing restrictions stack overflow. In addition to the usual open source license conditions, the gpl also requires users to redistribute any modified code under the same gpl. The open software license is a free software license. We normally use the gnu general public license gnu gpl, specifying version 3 or any later version, but occasionally we use other free software licenses. While open sourcing a project, one needs a license so that the terms distribution, linking, modification, private use, etc. An open source license protects contributors and users. Dont believe the hype, agpl open source licensing is toxic. The gpl is the free software foundations general public licence. Generally, mit recommends either the bsd license or the gplv2 or lgplv2 licenses. Gpl requires you to release the source code of your application if you choose to use and distribute the gpl licensed open source software with your application. Lookup popular software licenses summarized ataglance.
Panasonic allegedly refused to distribute the source code for its operating system, and by doing this, blocked its competitors including cokinetic from having the. The affero general public license affero gpl and informally affero license is a free software license. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the provenance and openness of the software. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses. It is incompatible with the gnu gpl in several ways. In fact, the two models for software licensing open source and proprietary trace their origins from a common source. Businesses and savvy developers wont touch a project without this protection. The gpl family of licenses is unique among open source licenses in how past, current, and future versions of the license may apply to the software program. Yes, when linking code statically or dynamically with gpllicensed, the copyleft of the gpl would typically apply to my code and should be made available under the gpl or a gplcompatible license and treated as gpllicensed.
Whether youre a software provider, it manager, or attorney advising clients on open source software, you must understand the general public license gpl. Gnu affero general public license version 3 open source. The emacs general public license, a february 1988 version, a direct predecessor of the gnu gpl. Most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. I dont understand how such reasonable restriction, apply when a double license is applied to a product.
Todays internet is built on opensource software, so its natural that you want to. Feb 24, 2020 the open source initiative maintains a list of approved open source licenses, which comply with the osis definition of open source. An opensource license oss is a legal contract that determines the. The purpose of this license is to ensure that a work can be freely distributed and modified by anybody, and that no proprietary works can be derived from the original work. If you have licensed software youve written under gpl version 2, and you are the original licensor of that software, you may wish to relicense your software under gpl version 3. Open source software license gnu gpl this projector product includes the open source software programs which apply the gnu general public license version 2 june 1991 gpl programs. The key innovation of the gpl license was the requirement that source code be provided along with any binary code distributed, ensuring that the. The result is that any software that uses any gpl open source component regardless of its percentage in the entire code is required to release.
31 173 661 460 1249 845 1140 59 643 1255 774 1449 1416 1267 1316 1218 694 1457 1442 920 388 553 1169 380 336 435 1313 1164 397 970 63 1323 894 814